As MOOCs evolve and fit
into the higher education environment, we should not forget the difficulty all
students face when they seek to discover how any prior learning would
articulate before they enroll – especially at selective schools. There
are several issues worth noting about recent blogs and press releases talking
about MOOCs and their potential disruptive effect on the higher education
eco-system:
1st,
selective and elite schools are generally not advocating transfer-friendly
policies, negatively impacting a high volume of students. Selective
schools may just segregate MOOCs as they have with continuing education credits
- to afford the popular marketing of prior learning. If MOOCs begin to
shift institutional priorities to emphasize adult or part-time student markets,
this is welcome behavior. However, we have a way to go before that
happens. How many schools will accept MOOCs for core major
requirements? Let’s not forget, most transfer credits apply as electives,
which result in more elective credits being taken than needed to graduate for
most students today.
2nd, now that
ACE is beginning to evaluate MOOCs for course credit recommendations, we need
to correct the false perspective that ACE is publishing course
equivalencies. ACE will publish recommendations, and institutions must
volunteer to map their own course equivalencies based upon these recommendations.
Some do this on a per-student basis as transcripts are
received. Some will perform the analysis proactively. The challenge
is to keep up with the equivalency implications coming from an increasing
number of sources when there is no form of standard mapping or general
alignment with regional feeders.
3rd, most
institutions are reluctant to proactively disclose transfer equivalencies
online, let alone how prior learning addresses core program requirements.
Students seldom are given the tools to assess “will my credits transfer.”
So, MOOC students seeking credit may learn their MOOC courses do not accelerate
their degree completion contrary to what is inferred by the MOOC
venues. AcademyOne’s CollegeTransfer.Net will include MOOC
equivalencies much like AP, CLEP, IB and other forms of course exam
assessments, but it will take time for institutions to assess and promote their
acceptance and tagging of MOOCs against their own course offerings. When
a course does not match those offerings, an institution may offer elective
credit or none at all.
4th, I believe MOOCs
will have the same difficulty mapping to core degree requirements that AP,
CLEP, IB, UCEL, Learning Counts and other prior learning credits face today.
There is major resistance from institutions about how they award credit for
prior learning regardless of the source of learning. Course currency is
not uniform, unless it fits within the general education common core of courses
being developed across some states.
5th, MOOCs
will be an alternative course platform for community colleges who are seeking
to offer students a wider choice of courses for non-credit and possible
credit. How MOOCs fit into two-year degree plans is yet to be seen.
Transcripts including MOOC courses have not been tested for how they will enable
student portability of credits from a two-year school to a four-year
school.
The anticipated huge
volume of MOOC students over the next few years most likely will not realize
the benefit and recognition of their learning achievement beyond elective courses
toward the goals of lowering their degree costs or lessening their time to a
degree. This will remain true unless
there are standards developed with governance that would create predicable
outcomes. Across the various sectors of higher education, this will
be hard to achieve even on a voluntary basis.
One prediction I may
make is that MOOC students may be good targets for less selective schools,
which may mean we will see the continued development of networks aligning
recognition and brands similar to transfer agreements or stackable
certificates. I am sure one or more institution will pursue this
avenue, but that still begs the question of how transferable and mobile these
credits will be across boundaries, institutions, departments and their majors.